#Naomi wolf archive

higher education has got this one right.” “At some level, a doctorate should require a public examination, but that is not really the case here - I’m not sure U.K.

“It shows that the British doctoral examining system is not as transparent or rigorous as it should be compared with other countries,” Hitchcock told Times Higher Education.

#Naomi wolf archive

Tim Hitchcock, professor of digital history at the University of Sussex, whose digital archive the Old Bailey Online contained the records misunderstood by Wolf, said the episode represented a “failure of supervision and examining.” He suggested that the unnamed examiners may have had backgrounds in English literature rather than legal history. But the release does not reveal who examined the thesis. It was finally published this month on Oxford’s online research archive, alongside nine pages of corrections that address Wolf’s misreading of criminal records and cite several texts that contradict claims that the mid- to late Victorian period saw an escalation of Britain’s persecution of gay men. The mistakes led to questions about how they were missed by Wolf’s supervisor and examiners, but her dissertation remained under embargo for six years after being examined in April 2015. University confirms cyberattack after weeks of rumors.The 'Welcome to College' Speech I Can't Give | Confessions of a Community College Dean.Dean Resigns Amid Claims He Lied About Academic Credentials.